
SHAKE THE DISEASE
January 31, 2009This is frightening on a number of levels to be sure. Obviously these females were still abusing one, or more, illegal substances throughout the pregnancy. If she was unable to quit, or at least get on methadone – if opiates were the issue – the moment she found out her condition – and once the decision was made to continue with the pregnancy – she made it abundantly clear how very selfish, and negligent, she really was. Obviously, no serious consideration was given to the potential damage she could cause for her unborn child with continued substancve abuse. Without exception, all of these women did nothing at all to even curtail or reduce the amount or frequency of their substancve abuse. For me, personally, I had an extremely difficult time even interacting with any of them while they were pregnant, as it was near impossible for me to refrain from comment about this abuse.
Last week when I ran into Ashley, I simply could not keep quiet, especially as she was the one to introduce this topic into our conversation. Since the birth of her daughter a few months ago, her use has actually escalated, not to mention that she has now introduced speed into her daily doses of 8mg dilaudid pills. I am sorry, but WTF? Currently, her and her boyfriend do not have an apartment of their own. They’ve been rotating staying at various friends pretty much on a semi regular basis. The baby is currently with her mother, and by the look of their current situation, will most likely stay with her for the foreseeable future. She mentioned that the Social Worker was giving her six months to get her act together.
She was given a guideline of sorts as to what was expected of her to accomplish in order for her daughter to be returned to her. She’s got about six weeks maximum now before she has to meet with Children’s Aid. At this hearing, she ostensibly is to present to them why they should return her daughter to her care, Obviously they’re going to want to see that she is serious about her recovery which means that she should be on MMT at the very minimum by this time. She is also going to have to prove to them that she has a permanent address with the appropriate amount of space, or rooms, for a newborn to be adequately maintained, never mind flourish. I’m also guessing that she’ll need to prove that she has all of the proper furniture, accessories, food, et al for the baby. No doubt there is considerably more things that will be required for her to do and have. CAS is certainly not going to hand the baby back to her in a cavalier manner. They will look at every last detail under a magnifying lens is my best guess.
So far, she’s not done any of this. Nothing. In fact, about the only thing that she has really done is ensure that now her boyfriend also has a hardcore dependence on opiates. What a pair! I told her as much. I said that she needed to get serious right away, especially if she really and truly wanted custody of her daughter. She maintains that she does, but I don’t know anymore. I look at all Of the women whom have gone before her these past two years, and all I see is the writing that is already on the walls. What’s really gut wrenchingly sad is that in the end, it is the children who will suffer because of these women’s ultimately selfish attitudes and choices. If they’ve decided that they are simply incapable of cutting drugs from their life no matter how hard they try, what they really need to do is remove themselves completely from their child’s life, because in the end, the inevitable sporadic contact with them will damage these innocent babies immensely. Do the unbelievably unselfish act of severing ties completely so that their child has a chance of finding a family who will nurture and love and be completely involved and committed to them. Otherwise these babies barely stand a chance, and they might as well admit defeat before they even have a chance to get started!
Custody of the newborn is the natural right of a mother and the newborn as well. This information is really strange for me.
In Canada, child welfare laws define and legislate what is considered “good parenting”. Social workers and the courts, through these laws, do intrude into the so-called “private sphere” of many families. Poor women and women of colour are most likely to be scrutinized and to have their children apprehended by the ministry and sent into foster care.
peace, love and happiness…
easytiger